Investigating Efl Students` Writing Practices Through Grammarly - Supported Learning

Jailani Jailani, Muhammad Hifdil Islam, Zainuddin Zainuddin

Abstract

Using a descriptive qualitative design, this study involved six EFL students who had experience using Grammarly in their English writing activities. The study aimed to examine how Grammarly is integrated into students’ writing practices and to identify the aspects of writing supported by the application. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, documentation, and screenshots comparing students’ writing before and after revision using Grammarly. The data were analyzed through data reduction, conclusion drawing, and verification. The findings revealed that Grammarly supported students in reflective learning by assisting them in reviewing, revising, and evaluating their writing. The application provided immediate feedback that enhanced students’ engagement and metacognitive awareness, while encouraging them to critically evaluate suggestions before applying revisions. Grammarly supported several aspects of writing, including grammatical accuracy, consistency in tense usage, subject–verb agreement, sentence structure, vocabulary choice, writing clarity, and overall writing quality. These improvements contributed to more accurate, coherent, and readable texts. Students also reported increased confidence and greater independence in completing writing tasks. However, participants emphasized that Grammarly could not replace lecturers’ feedback, particularly in understanding contextual meaning and supporting idea development. Overall, Grammarly functioned as a learning companion that encouraged EFL students to engage in more critical, process-oriented, and autonomous writing practices. These findings suggest that integrating Grammarly into English writing instruction can enhance grammatical accuracy, self-editing skills, and writing confidence while enabling teachers to provide more effective feedback and foster learner autonomy in the writing process.

References

Armanda, M. L., Nugraheni, A. F., Wulansari, A., & Imron, A. (2022). “ Grammarly” as English Writing Assistant from EFL Students’ Perspective. English Education: Journal of English Teaching and Research, 7(2), 128–137.
Chand, S. P. (2025). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews, focus groups, observations, and document analysis. Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(1), 303–317.
Fitria, T. N. (2021). Grammarly as AI-powered English writing assistant: Students’ alternative for writing English. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 5(1), 65–78.
Fodil-Cherif, S. B. (2021). EFL writing skills development through literature. Education and Linguistics Research, 7(2), 1–8.
Hakiki, G. N. R. (2021). Perception of EFL students on the use Grammarly application in writing class. Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development, 4(2), 99–106.
Hamdani, B. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in teaching English in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Darussalam English Journal (DEJ), 5(1), 39–46.
Hidayat, A., & Sari, R. (2025). The Effect of Using Grammarly on EFL Students’ Writing Accuracy: A Quasi-Experimental Research. Journal of Linguistics and Social Sciences, 3(2), 75–82.
Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge university press.
Javanbakhti, S. (2021). Technology-mediated Second Language Tasks: An Overview. Journal of English Literature and Cultural Studies, 2(1), 25–27.
Khonirin, F. A., & Roslaini, R. (2024). EFL students’ perceptions towards the use of Grammarly application in learning writing skills. Scripta: English Department Journal, 11(2), 187–194.
Lai, J. W., Qiu, W., Thway, M., Zhang, L., Jamil, N. B., Su, C. L., Ng, S. S. H., & Lim, F. S. (2025). Leveraging Process-Action Epistemic Network Analysis to Illuminate Student Self-Regulated Learning with a Socratic Chatbot. Journal of Learning Analytics, 12(1), 32–49.
Leow, R. P. (2026). Ronald P. Leow’s essential bookshelf: The L2 learning process in instructed second language acquisition (ISLA). Language Teaching, 59(1), 82–95.
Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229.
Lötscher, F., Trüb, R., Lohmann, J., Möller, J., Jansen, T., & Keller, S. D. (2025). Development of grammatical and lexical skills in argumentative EFL writing at upper secondary level in Germany and Switzerland. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1605658.
Raihan, I., Febriani, R. B., & Irianti, L. (2023). EFL students’ perception of using Grammarly in under-graduate paper writing. International Journal of Innovation and Education Research, 2(1), 26–36.
Ranalli, J. (2021). L2 student engagement with automated feedback on writing: Potential for learning and issues of trust. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, 100816.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers.
Sarmiento-Campos, N.-V., Lázaro-Guillermo, J. C., Silvera-Alarcón, E.-N., Cuellar-Quispe, S., Huamán-Romaní, Y.-L., Apaza, O. A., & Sorkheh, A. (2022). A look at Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory (SCT): The effectiveness of scaffolding method on EFL learners’ speaking achievement. Education Research International, 2022(1), 3514892.
Setiawan, F., & Alkhowarizmi, A. (2025). Exploring an Artificial Intelligence as Automated Feedback Program in EFL Writing. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 16(1), 202–224.
Tung, C.-A. J. (2026). Integrating Visible Thinking Routines into an EFL Writing Class to Scaffold and Foster Critical Thinking and Writing. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 102141.
Wang, C., Chen, X., Yu, T., Liu, Y., & Jing, Y. (2024). Education reform and change driven by digital technology: A bibliometric study from a global perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–17.

Authors

Jailani Jailani
Muhammad Hifdil Islam
muhammad.hifdil@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Zainuddin Zainuddin
Jailani, J., Islam, M. H., & Zainuddin, Z. (2026). Investigating Efl Students` Writing Practices Through Grammarly - Supported Learning. Interling : International Journal of English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 4(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.55210/interling.v4i1.2615
Copyright and license info is not available

Article Details

Most read articles by the same author(s)